What The Bulls Got Wrong Before iQIYI Fell 59%

iQIYI has spent 2026 talking up AI tools, overseas dramas, and buybacks, yet quarterly updates still describe falling revenue and widening losses. Investors who held iQIYI from the start of the year are down 59.3%, including dividends. If you backed the idea that a rising Chinese middle class and new content formats would steadily lift ARPU and margins, which of those specific assumptions failed to account for this outcome, without implying the entire thesis was flawed?

If the move has made iQIYI harder to judge, start where the gap is still open and scan 33 high quality undervalued stocks.

The Two Futures Investors Were Arguing About For iQIYI

The shares cost US$1.92 at the start of the period, and the live argument around iQIYI was about which future you thought was more plausible, not whether streaming in China would matter.

The bullish story pointed to a Fair Value of US$2.41, a price implied by assumptions of rising ARPU from premium long-form and female-focused content, plus mini dramas feeding a broader, paying user base.

The cautious view anchored on a Fair Value of US$1, built on concerns that tighter Chinese regulation, piracy, and saturated streaming markets would raise compliance and content costs while keeping subscriber growth subdued.

What The iQIYI Results Did To The Original Argument

iQIYI’s 2026 reports showed total revenue slipping from RMB 6.63b in Q2 2025 to RMB 6.29b in Q2 2026 while net losses deepened and net margin moved from a 2.0% loss to a 4.6% loss. That challenged the bullish expectation of improving profitability, even as membership revenue, overseas subscribers, and AI driven tools like Nadou Pro backed the idea that new formats could expand paying users. Overall, the evidence cut both ways.

The useful takeaway is where you focus your checks. When a thesis leans on margin lift and higher ARPU, treat net margin and segment revenue such as membership as the scorecard rather than headline user metrics or marketing buzz around new technology.

What You Are Being Asked To Believe In iQIYI Today

iQIYI trades at US$0.83 after a 59.3% loss from the start of the year, and the selected Narrative’s Fair Value sits above that quote. The argument focuses on AI assisted production, micro dramas and overseas audiences making the content engine leaner and more diversified.

For that higher figure to be reached, a buyer today would be counting on AI driven workflows and creator tools to reduce average content costs while supporting wider international revenue.

"As NadouPro and other AI tools move beyond pilots and into routine use across more than 100 original productions and thousands of AI generated titles, iQIYI has scope to convert current workflow gains such as higher VFX efficiency and faster rough cuts into a structurally leaner content cost base. This would support higher net margins even if headline content spend stays roughly flat."

That disagreement has a full argument behind it. → Uncover the higher Fair Value this Narrative argues for

Watching iQIYI And Looking Sideways

iQIYI is leaning into AI tooling, yet you are still watching execution risk. That invites a different question. Who else turns heavy AI spending into everyday products people already use?

One large platform business is doing that at industrial scale. It folds generative models into search, video, productivity software and security tools.

The same theme shows up in its cloud unit. Clients there are paying for AI infrastructure, not just storage and computing capacity.

If AI workflows eventually matter more to iQIYI’s costs than headlines, this other firm shows one path. You can now see how that story is currently priced.

The case is on the record, with the assumptions it rests on. → See the Narrative that values this company 55% above its price

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com