Note: These figures reflect diluted GAAP earnings per share, reported before non-recurring items, and may differ from the non-GAAP figures used by some sources.
Antero Midstream reports after market close, meaning Day 0 reflects anticipatory trading before results are released, while Day +1 captures the market's first full reaction to the actual numbers.
| Earnings Date | Day 0 Move | Day 0 Range | Day +1 Move | Day +1 Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-29 | -$0.23 (-1.06%) | $0.41 (1.89%) | +$0.03 (+0.14%) | $0.81 (3.76%) |
| 2026-04-29 | +$0.02 (+0.09%) | $0.39 (1.78%) | -$0.02 (-0.09%) | $1.23 (5.64%) |
| 2026-02-11 | +$0.54 (+2.71%) | $0.61 (3.07%) | +$0.47 (+2.30%) | $0.62 (3.03%) |
| 2025-10-29 | -$0.08 (-0.45%) | $0.27 (1.55%) | -$0.04 (-0.23%) | $0.64 (3.68%) |
| 2025-07-30 | +$0.16 (+0.94%) | $0.36 (2.09%) | +$1.21 (+7.06%) | $1.25 (7.26%) |
| 2025-04-30 | -$0.37 (-2.19%) | $0.57 (3.38%) | +$0.32 (+1.93%) | $0.67 (4.02%) |
| 2025-02-12 | -$0.26 (-1.61%) | $0.37 (2.30%) | +$0.97 (+6.12%) | $0.88 (5.55%) |
| 2024-10-30 | +$0.12 (+0.81%) | $0.26 (1.75%) | -$0.63 (-4.20%) | $0.45 (3.00%) |
| Avg Abs Move | 1.23% | 2.23% | 2.76% | 4.49% |
Historical price action around AM earnings shows relatively muted Day 0 moves averaging 1.23%, but significantly larger Day +1 reactions averaging 2.76%—consistent with an after-close reporter where the real response comes the following session. The average Day +1 intraday range of 4.49% indicates substantial volatility as investors digest results.
Recent quarters show mixed directional patterns. The July 2026 report (most recent) saw a modest -1.06% Day 0 move followed by a minimal +0.14% Day +1 reaction—likely reflecting disappointment with the 11% EPS miss. In contrast, July 2025 delivered a powerful +7.06% Day +1 surge despite a small +0.94% Day 0 move, suggesting a significant beat or positive guidance. The February 2026 report produced strong two-day gains (+2.71% Day 0, +2.30% Day +1), while April 2026 was essentially flat.
The data suggests AM's post-earnings moves are highly result-dependent rather than directionally predictable, with the magnitude of Day +1 reactions (ranging from +0.14% to +7.06%) varying dramatically based on whether the company beats or misses estimates. Given the four-quarter miss streak, a beat could trigger an outsized positive reaction, while another miss might produce limited downside given lowered expectations.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Expiration Date | 11/20/26 (DTE 24) |
| Expected Move | $1.10 (5.20%) |
| Expected Range | $20.00 to $22.20 |
| Implied Volatility | 32.33% |
The options market is pricing a 5.20% expected move for the November expiration, which sits between the historical Day 0 average of 1.23% and the Day +1 average of 2.76%, but falls well short of the 4.49% average Day +1 intraday range. This suggests options traders may be underpricing potential volatility, particularly if the company delivers a meaningful beat or miss that breaks the recent pattern.
Analyst sentiment on Antero Midstream reflects cautious skepticism despite a modest recent improvement. The consensus rating stands at 2.75 (between Sell and Hold) across 8 analysts, with the average price target of $23.75 implying 12.6% upside from the current $21.10 price.
The breakdown shows 1 Strong Buy, 5 Holds, and 2 Strong Sells—a distribution that leans defensive. However, sentiment has deteriorated over the past month, with the average recommendation weakening from 3.00 to 2.75. One analyst downgraded from Hold to Strong Sell during this period, reflecting growing concerns about the company's ability to convert operational strength into earnings beats.
Price targets range from a low of $22.00 to a high of $26.00, a relatively tight $4.00 spread that suggests limited conviction in either direction. The $23.75 mean target sits just 12.6% above the current price, indicating analysts see modest upside potential but are waiting for proof that the balance sheet improvements and accelerated buybacks will finally drive EPS beats. The deteriorating sentiment trend suggests analysts are losing patience with the four-quarter miss streak and need to see tangible evidence that Q3 marks a genuine turning point rather than another operational win that fails to reach the bottom line.
The Barchart Technical Opinion currently shows a 72% Sell signal, unchanged from last week but significantly weaker than the 40% Sell reading from a month ago. This deterioration reflects growing technical pressure as the stock has failed to hold key longer-term support levels.
Timeframe Analysis:
Trend Characteristics: The signal strength is classified as Weak and the direction is Weakening, indicating the stock is in a deteriorating technical environment with limited conviction in either direction—a setup that amplifies the importance of the earnings result.
The current price of $21.10 trades above the 5-day ($20.82), 10-day ($20.65), and 20-day ($20.71) moving averages, showing short-term resilience. However, the stock sits below all longer-term averages: the 50-day ($21.42), 100-day ($21.77), and 200-day ($21.53). This configuration—short-term support with longer-term resistance overhead—creates a technical squeeze where the earnings reaction could determine whether AM reclaims the $21.50+ zone or breaks back toward the $20.00 level.
| Period | Value | Period | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-Day MA | $20.82 | 50-Day MA | $21.42 |
| 10-Day MA | $20.65 | 100-Day MA | $21.77 |
| 20-Day MA | $20.71 | 200-Day MA | $21.53 |
Key resistance sits at the 50-day moving average of $21.42, which the stock is testing from below. A strong earnings beat that drives the stock above $21.50 would flip the intermediate-term technical picture and potentially trigger short covering. Conversely, another EPS miss could send AM back toward the 20-day moving average at $20.71 or even the recent $20.00 support zone. The overall technical setup is cautionary—the deteriorating medium-term signal and weakening trend characteristics suggest the path of least resistance is lower unless management delivers a decisive earnings beat that changes the narrative from "operational strength, earnings weakness" to genuine bottom-line improvement.