Zions Bancorporation entered this Q3 2026 report with a mixed recent run, essentially flat over the past month and down over the last quarter, then the stock jumped about 2.3% to US$64.59 after investors had a first look at the numbers. The headline is simple. Net income to common holders came in at US$262 million with earnings per share of roughly US$1.81, supported by a net interest margin of 3.23% that held up despite higher funding costs. The market reacted quickly. The real story is in how that margin pressure and credit quality trend line up from here.
Like the income line but uneasy about margin pressure at Zions Bancorporation National Association as funding costs bite into that 3.23% net interest spread? Compare it with banks and financials that pair resilient profitability with stronger balance sheets in our list of solid balance sheet and fundamentals stocks (25 results).
Earnings tell you what Zions Bancorporation National Association just reported, but investors who care about valuation often anchor on the cash flowing through the business instead of a single quarter of profit. On Zions Bancorporation National Association's cash flows alone, the stock could be a whopping 48% undervalued.
"The main thing that has to go right is that investments in technology, AI and outsourced services actually translate into the positive operating leverage that management is targeting."
Zions Bancorporation is showing only partial progress toward that operating leverage goal. Adjusted noninterest expense rose about 1% while taxable-equivalent NII increased 1%, which lines up with management trimming 2026 operating leverage expectations to a range of 40 to 50 bps instead of 100 to 150 bps. Fee income is helping, with customer related fees up year on year and capital markets flagged as stronger into Q4, yet the evidence so far points to slow, not transformational, cost efficiency from tech and AI spending.
"The company’s funding advantage is an important part of the current thesis. However, recent commentary highlights intense competition for deposits and targeted campaigns that already price close to wholesale levels."
The latest quarter shows this concern is real for Zions Bancorporation. NIM slipped to 3.23% as higher deposit costs and a bigger money market position weighed on spread income, even with NII slightly higher. Average deposits expanded at an annualized rate of 8.8% and campaigns like the Gold product helped bring US$3.5b back on balance sheet, yet management now models deposit betas in the upper 40s to low 50s and cost of deposits rising toward 2%, which keeps margin risk front and center.
That disagreement has a full argument behind it. → Uncover the higher Fair Value this Narrative argues for.
Zions Bancorporation National Association highlights how margin pressure and funding costs can offset a steady income line. The opportunity is identifying companies whose earnings power and fundamentals may not be fully reflected in current valuations.
That is three of the list. See all 34 potentially undervalued companies →
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com