-+ 0.00%
-+ 0.00%
-+ 0.00%

Schwab Treasury ETF vs iShares Corporate Bond Fund

The Motley Fool·10/06/2026 14:35:02
Listen to the news

Key Points

  • Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF features a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.03% compared to 0.14% for the iShares fund.

  • iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF has much higher assets under management (AUM) and a more established history.

  • Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF has faced a deeper maximum drawdown of 40.9% over the last five years.

The choice between iShares iBoxx $Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (NYSEMKT:LQD) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (NYSEMKT:SCHQ) often comes down to a preference for corporate credit risk versus government duration risk -- the risk that a bond fund's share price will fall when interest rates rise.

Both funds serve as core components for fixed-income investors, but they target different segments of the bond market. While LQD invests in investment-grade corporate debt, SCHQ focuses on the long end of the U.S. Treasury curve, offering different sensitivities to interest rate shifts and economic cycles.

Snapshot (cost & size)

Metric LQD SCHQ
Issuer iShares Schwab
Share price $101.55 (as of 2026-10-05) $28.07 (as of 2026-10-05)
Expense ratio 0.14% 0.03%
1-yr return (as of 2026-10-02) (4.15%) (7.70%)
Dividend yield 5.35% 4.9%
Beta 1.35 2.24
AUM $26.8 billion $908 million

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from monthly returns over the available fund history (up to five years). The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is the trailing-12-month distribution yield.

The Schwab fund is the more affordable option, with a 0.03% expense ratio, significantly lower than the 0.14% charged by the iShares fund.

Performance & risk comparison

Metric LQD SCHQ
Max drawdown (5 yr) (24.9%) (40.9%)
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years (total return) $955 $691

What's inside

The Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF focuses on the long-duration segment of the U.S. Treasury bond market. This fixed-income fund has no equity sector breakdown but holds 102 different issues. It was launched in 2019. Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF has paid $1.47 per share over the trailing 12 months, which, on its recent ~$28.07 share price, works out to a 5.2% yield.

The iShares iBoxx $Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF focuses on high-quality corporate bonds issued and traded in U.S. dollars. It currently holds 3,179 holdings, and the fund is highly diversified -- no single position exceeds 0.19% of the portfolio. It was launched in 2002. iShares iBoxx $Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF has paid $5.05 per share over the trailing 12 months, which, on its recent ~$101.55 share price, works out to a 4.9% yield.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

Which looks like the better buy

Whether the Schwab Treasury ETF or the iShares iBoxx $Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF is a better buy depends on your priorities.

SCHD may be the better buy if:

  • Your goal is long-term growth plus rising dividends.
  • You seek a fund stocked with established U.S. companies, known for their financial strength and dividend quality.
  • You appreciate a very low expense ratio.
  • You specifically want an investment with the potential to provide some inflation protection.

Potential risk: SCHD is an equity fund, meaning its price can fall sharply during market downturns.

LQD may be a better buy if:

  • You want the broad fixed-income diversification provided by more than 3,000+ investment-grade corporate bonds.
  • You're attracted to the higher income yield.
  • You find bond income more predictable than SCHD's dividends.
  • Your portfolio is currently stock-heavy, and you're looking to diversify and balance your holdings.

Potential risk: Corporate bonds can lose value when interest rates rise or when a company's credit quality deteriorates.

While both are fine ETFs, one is not a substitute for the other. The wise move may be to choose SCHD for long-term wealth building and LQD for higher current income and portfolio diversification.

Dana George has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.