Arbor Realty Trust has been hit hard, with the share price down sharply over the past few years, yet the intrinsic value work points to the stock trading below its estimated worth while traditional market multiples say it looks expensive. For anyone tracking this REIT, the split between the Excess Returns model and the market based checks makes the current price tricky to read.
The issue now is whether the current discount to the intrinsic value estimate offers enough compensation for the risks that the wider valuation checks are flagging for Arbor Realty Trust.
Spot opportunities across other beaten up yet potentially mispriced lenders by scanning our hand picked 31 high quality undervalued stocks, which pairs solid fundamentals with discounted valuations.The Excess Returns model estimates what Arbor Realty Trust can earn on its equity after covering the cost of that equity. Arbor screens with a Book Value of $11.35 per share and a Stable EPS assumption of $0.95 per share, based on the median return on equity from the past 5 years, compared with a Cost of Equity of $1.33 per share. That gap points to an excess return of $0.37 per share being eroded, since the estimated cost of capital sits above the steady earnings power.
An average return on equity of 9.01% and a Stable Book Value of $10.60 per share, sourced from weighted future book estimates by 4 analysts, feed into the Excess Returns valuation and produce an intrinsic value of $6.36 per share. With Arbor Realty Trust changing hands at a level that implies a 22.7% discount to that figure, the model suggests the stock price is not fully reflecting the equity earning capacity implied by these assumptions.
On this Excess Returns view, Arbor Realty Trust currently screens as undervalued.
Our Excess Returns analysis suggests Arbor Realty Trust is undervalued by 22.7%. Track this in your watchlist or portfolio, or discover 31 more high quality undervalued stocks.
P/E works well for Arbor Realty Trust because earnings are a central hook for how investors judge mortgage REITs. On that score, the stock trades on a P/E of about 56.2x, which is far above both the Mortgage REITs industry average of 8.8x and a peer group that clusters closer to 14.4x. That gap signals investors are paying a steep premium for each dollar of recent earnings compared with much of the sector.
The fair P/E ratio implied by the broader model is 24.5x. Arbor Realty Trust is therefore pricing at more than double that benchmark, which suggests the current share price already builds in a rich view of the business relative to what the company traits and risk profile would typically support on this framework.
On the P/E lens alone, Arbor Realty Trust looks overvalued compared with both its tailored fair multiple and the wider Mortgage REITs group.
See what the numbers say about this price — find out in our valuation breakdown.
Simply Wall St Narratives for Arbor Realty Trust pick up where this valuation puzzle leaves off. They explain which potential paths for Arbor Realty Trust's growth, profitability and risk profile would need to occur for the shares to be worth significantly more or less than the current quote. Each narrative links its valuation figures to a specific view on how growth, margins and potential setbacks might evolve, so you can later compare those assumptions with fresh data on the Community page.
One of the top community narratives on Arbor Realty Trust: 59% undervalued
"Arbor Realty Trust's resilience, strategic loan modifications, and diversified revenue streams bolster shareholder confidence and competitive advantage in a challenging environment..."
Read one of the top narratives on Arbor Realty Trust
Do you think there's more to the story for Arbor Realty Trust? Head over to our Community to see what others are saying!
Arbor Realty Trust screens as undervalued on the Excess Returns intrinsic value work, yet looks overvalued on a P/E basis that leans heavily on how the market prices its earnings against mortgage REIT peers. The split comes from what each lens cares about. The intrinsic value estimate focuses on the relationship between book value, funding costs and equity returns, while the multiple view reflects investor expectations for growth, risk and sentiment right now. With the broader valuation checks looking weak, the key question is whether funding costs and credit quality improve enough to justify the premium earnings multiple, or whether the discount becomes a value trap.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com