On September 10, the Third Intermediate People's Court of Shanghai publicly ruled in the first instance in the case of Zhang Rong, former deputy party group secretary and vice-chairman of the Shanghai Chongming District Committee, for taking bribes. Defendant Zhang Rong was sentenced to 10 years and 2 months in prison and a fine of RMB 600,000 yuan for taking bribes; the property and proceeds of the bribery were recovered and handed over to the national treasury. The trial revealed that from 1998 to 2025, defendant Zhang Rong successively used the convenience and position of authority or position as former Party Secretary, Deputy Party Secretary, Deputy Director, and Director of the Chongming County Construction Committee, former Deputy Party Secretary and Director of the Chongming County Construction and Management Committee, former Party Secretary and Director of the Chongming County Development and Reform Commission, former Deputy Chairman of the Chongming County People's Congress Standing Committee, and former Chairman of the Chongming County Federation of Trade Unions, and former Deputy Party Secretary and Vice Chairman of the Shanghai Chongming District Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference Facilitative conditions, directly or through The official behavior of workers from other countries helped others in matters such as undertaking projects, etc., and illegally accepted property amounting to a total of more than RMB 6.31 million. The Shanghai Third Intermediate Court held that defendant Zhang Rong's actions constituted the crime of taking bribes. The amount was particularly huge and should be punished according to law. In view of Zhang Rong's true confession of the crime after arriving at the case, he voluntarily confessed some facts about the bribery not yet known to the authorities handling the case, which had honest circumstances; he voluntarily pleaded guilty and actively refunded. All of the proceeds and proceeds of the bribery have been refunded, and there are statutory and discretionary leniency circumstances, so he can be given a lighter punishment according to law. The court then handed down the above verdict.

On September 10, the Third Intermediate People's Court of Shanghai publicly ruled in the first instance in the case of Zhang Rong, former deputy party group secretary and vice-chairman of the Shanghai Chongming District Committee, for taking bribes. Defendant Zhang Rong was sentenced to 10 years and 2 months in prison and a fine of RMB 600,000 yuan for taking bribes; the property and proceeds of the bribery were recovered and handed over to the national treasury. The trial revealed that from 1998 to 2025, defendant Zhang Rong successively used the convenience and position of authority or position as former Party Secretary, Deputy Party Secretary, Deputy Director, and Director of the Chongming County Construction Committee, former Deputy Party Secretary and Director of the Chongming County Construction and Management Committee, former Party Secretary and Director of the Chongming County Development and Reform Commission, former Deputy Chairman of the Chongming County People's Congress Standing Committee, and former Chairman of the Chongming County Federation of Trade Unions, and former Deputy Party Secretary and Vice Chairman of the Shanghai Chongming District Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference Facilitative conditions, directly or through The official behavior of workers from other countries helped others in matters such as undertaking projects, etc., and illegally accepted property amounting to a total of more than RMB 6.31 million. The Shanghai Third Intermediate Court held that defendant Zhang Rong's actions constituted the crime of taking bribes. The amount was particularly huge and should be punished according to law. In view of Zhang Rong's true confession of the crime after arriving at the case, he voluntarily confessed some facts about the bribery not yet known to the authorities handling the case, which had honest circumstances; he voluntarily pleaded guilty and actively refunded. All of the proceeds and proceeds of the bribery have been refunded, and there are statutory and discretionary leniency circumstances, so he can be given a lighter punishment according to law. The court then handed down the above verdict.