According to the CITIC Securities Research Report, since Trump's second term, the US tech right has gradually risen and dominated the US technology regulatory system, making US AI regulations generally show a “light regulation” style. However, with the rapid development of AI, America's technological right wing and political forces such as national securism and economic populism are divided, or the reason for the recent marginal strengthening of AI regulations in the US. Looking at the political game, we believe that the right in technology will continue to dominate at least during Trump's term. It is expected that US AI regulation may present the following four major directions: one is to clarify technical review standards, the second is to strengthen military control in defense, the third is to strengthen application risk management and control in society, and fourth, to focus on the balance of national security and commercial interests in external competition.

According to the CITIC Securities Research Report, since Trump's second term, the US tech right has gradually risen and dominated the US technology regulatory system, making US AI regulations generally show a “light regulation” style. However, with the rapid development of AI, America's technological right wing and political forces such as national securism and economic populism are divided, or the reason for the recent marginal strengthening of AI regulations in the US. Looking at the political game, we believe that the right in technology will continue to dominate at least during Trump's term. It is expected that US AI regulation may present the following four major directions: one is to clarify technical review standards, the second is to strengthen military control in defense, the third is to strengthen application risk management and control in society, and fourth, to focus on the balance of national security and commercial interests in external competition.