-+ 0.00%
-+ 0.00%
-+ 0.00%

The Financial Times, which is in charge of the People's Bank of China, published an article saying that a domestic animated film that was ridiculed by netizens for its “impressive picture quality” has become the most magical theatrical “miracle” in the summer program. On the afternoon of August 16, among the top five hot stocks in Tonghuashun, Jinniu Chemical, Bull Group, and Tongniu Information, three individual stocks with the name “Bull” were collectively listed. Jinniu Chemical reached the top with 396,000 hits. On August 17, individual stocks of “bull-character” surged for a while, but in the end, the increase narrowed. This was essentially a short-term emotional pulse triggered by a “harmonic disorder.” When it's lively, the truth still needs to be clarified. The three listed companies have no equity relationships, business cooperation, or revenue shares with “Niulai”, and the film producer is not an A-share company. Jinniu Chemical's main business is methanol production and sales. Tongniu Information provides integrated Internet services such as Internet data center services and cloud services, while Bull Group focuses on the field of civilian electrical products. In other words, the attention received by individual “bull-character” stocks mainly comes from emotional associations brought about by the homonym of the name, and has little to do with the company's own business conditions. In fact, similar “name quotes” are not uncommon in A-share history. Every time there is a hot event, individual stocks with similar names are always briefly “cared for” by capital, but the market often comes and goes fast. From “Valentine's Day concept stocks” in the early years, to individual stock changes with homonymous names during major events, to nonsensical ups and downs under various “conceptual blessings,” similar dramas appeared over and over again. The common characteristics are that they are far-fetched, logic cannot withstand scrutiny, funds move in and out quickly, and the market is fleeting. When the hype ebbs down, the first ones to get hurt are often the followers who feel it later. Investors still need to pay attention to the risk of emotional hype when it comes to the sudden emergence of “Bullai” concept stocks, and avoid directly equating the Internet craze with the investment logic of listed companies.

Zhitongcaijing·08/18/2026 05:09:03
Listen to the news
The Financial Times, which is in charge of the People's Bank of China, published an article saying that a domestic animated film that was ridiculed by netizens for its “impressive picture quality” has become the most magical theatrical “miracle” in the summer program. On the afternoon of August 16, among the top five hot stocks in Tonghuashun, Jinniu Chemical, Bull Group, and Tongniu Information, three individual stocks with the name “Bull” were collectively listed. Jinniu Chemical reached the top with 396,000 hits. On August 17, individual stocks of “bull-character” surged for a while, but in the end, the increase narrowed. This was essentially a short-term emotional pulse triggered by a “harmonic disorder.” When it's lively, the truth still needs to be clarified. The three listed companies have no equity relationships, business cooperation, or revenue shares with “Niulai”, and the film producer is not an A-share company. Jinniu Chemical's main business is methanol production and sales. Tongniu Information provides integrated Internet services such as Internet data center services and cloud services, while Bull Group focuses on the field of civilian electrical products. In other words, the attention received by individual “bull-character” stocks mainly comes from emotional associations brought about by the homonym of the name, and has little to do with the company's own business conditions. In fact, similar “name quotes” are not uncommon in A-share history. Every time there is a hot event, individual stocks with similar names are always briefly “cared for” by capital, but the market often comes and goes fast. From “Valentine's Day concept stocks” in the early years, to individual stock changes with homonymous names during major events, to nonsensical ups and downs under various “conceptual blessings,” similar dramas appeared over and over again. The common characteristics are that they are far-fetched, logic cannot withstand scrutiny, funds move in and out quickly, and the market is fleeting. When the hype ebbs down, the first ones to get hurt are often the followers who feel it later. Investors still need to pay attention to the risk of emotional hype when it comes to the sudden emergence of “Bullai” concept stocks, and avoid directly equating the Internet craze with the investment logic of listed companies.