-+ 0.00%
-+ 0.00%
-+ 0.00%

Fired for privately mining 71 million dollars, South Korean court upholds original sentence

Zhitongcaijing·08/11/2026 06:17:05
Listen to the news

According to Woofun AI, a South Korean court officially rejected the claim of “A”, a former senior official of the Korea Food Research Institute and upheld his dismissal for secretly using institutional resources to mine cryptocurrencies. This ruling directly characterized the nature of the official's actions and highlighted the serious legal and moral consequences of using public facilities for personal gain. After an internal investigation revealed his irregularity, the former official tried to reverse the dismissal decision through legal channels, but the judiciary ultimately determined that his liability was not exempt.

The factual details of the violation show that the official installed two GPU servers without permission in a public relations hall storage area that had actually been discontinued. Between February and September 2023, it used these devices to mine around 71 million altcoins.

More importantly, he also used the agency's budget without authorization to pay expenses related to air conditioning installation, network construction, and electrical engineering. According to Woofun AI, these covert operations not only involve hardware deployment, but also directly encroach on public financial resources, constituting substantial misuse of institutional budgets.

In its ruling logic, the court clearly stated that according to socially accepted standards, the dismissal was not a disciplinary measure that had no effect, and therefore rejected the official's claim that the punishment was excessive or that the procedure was flawed. This case profoundly reflects the strict responsibility that public officials must bear when using institutional resources for personal gain. Under the Korean legal framework, using public property for private purposes is a serious offense, often leading to criminal charges and dismissal from office. The judgement further shows that even senior officials are not exempt from liability and that the judiciary clearly supports disciplinary action when it is reasonable and proportionate.

Legal experts analyzed that this ruling is consistent with South Korea's overall efforts to curb corruption and misuse of public assets, and sends a clear signal to public agencies to strengthen supervision of resource use and strictly implement disciplinary measures. For taxpayers, it is critical to establish sound monitoring mechanisms to prevent such abuses. As cryptocurrency mining becomes more common, the ruling reflects the legal community's increasingly strict scrutiny of related activities, particularly when it affects public trust and governance order. This case will probably set a precedent for similar disputes in the future and reaffirm the principle that public resources must be used only for public purposes.