Shareholders were pleased with the recent earnings report from Mongolia Energy Corporation Limited (HKG:276). Investors should be cautious however, as there some causes of concern deeper in the numbers.
Many investors haven't heard of the accrual ratio from cashflow, but it is actually a useful measure of how well a company's profit is backed up by free cash flow (FCF) during a given period. To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. You could think of the accrual ratio from cashflow as the 'non-FCF profit ratio'.
Therefore, it's actually considered a good thing when a company has a negative accrual ratio, but a bad thing if its accrual ratio is positive. While it's not a problem to have a positive accrual ratio, indicating a certain level of non-cash profits, a high accrual ratio is arguably a bad thing, because it indicates paper profits are not matched by cash flow. That's because some academic studies have suggested that high accruals ratios tend to lead to lower profit or less profit growth.
Over the twelve months to March 2026, Mongolia Energy recorded an accrual ratio of 0.35. Unfortunately, that means its free cash flow was a lot less than its statutory profit, which makes us doubt the utility of profit as a guide. Even though it reported a profit of HK$472.0m, a look at free cash flow indicates it actually burnt through HK$18m in the last year. We saw that FCF was HK$200m a year ago though, so Mongolia Energy has at least been able to generate positive FCF in the past. However, that's not all there is to consider. We can see that unusual items have impacted its statutory profit, and therefore the accrual ratio. The good news for shareholders is that Mongolia Energy's accrual ratio was much better last year, so this year's poor reading might simply be a case of a short term mismatch between profit and FCF. Shareholders should look for improved cashflow relative to profit in the current year, if that is indeed the case.
View our latest analysis for Mongolia Energy
Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of Mongolia Energy.
Given the accrual ratio, it's not overly surprising that Mongolia Energy's profit was boosted by unusual items worth HK$262m in the last twelve months. While it's always nice to have higher profit, a large contribution from unusual items sometimes dampens our enthusiasm. When we crunched the numbers on thousands of publicly listed companies, we found that a boost from unusual items in a given year is often not repeated the next year. And that's as you'd expect, given these boosts are described as 'unusual'. We can see that Mongolia Energy's positive unusual items were quite significant relative to its profit in the year to March 2026. As a result, we can surmise that the unusual items are making its statutory profit significantly stronger than it would otherwise be.
Mongolia Energy had a weak accrual ratio, but its profit did receive a boost from unusual items. For the reasons mentioned above, we think that a perfunctory glance at Mongolia Energy's statutory profits might make it look better than it really is on an underlying level. If you'd like to know more about Mongolia Energy as a business, it's important to be aware of any risks it's facing. Be aware that Mongolia Energy is showing 4 warning signs in our investment analysis and 3 of those are concerning...
Our examination of Mongolia Energy has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. And, on that basis, we are somewhat skeptical. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.