Adobe (ADBE) Stock Still Looks Like A Bargain Despite A 62% Slump

Adobe stock has had a tough run over the past five years, with the share price down 62.2%. However, current valuation checks suggest the shares look cheap rather than expensive.

• Over the last five years, Adobe has declined 62.2%, which means long-term holders are sitting on sizeable losses even after the recent rebound.
• Ongoing investment in generative AI across Adobe Experience Cloud can support growth expectations, while competition in design and content tools, including from Figma and large AI platforms, may pressure what investors are willing to pay for that growth.
• On Simply Wall St's broader valuation checks, Adobe screens as undervalued in 5 of 6 areas. This suggests the current market price may be below what the fundamentals support5.

For investors, the debate is whether the current discount after a prolonged share price decline is a genuine opportunity in Adobe or a value trap that reflects lasting concerns about its earnings power.

Find out why Adobe's -36.2% return over the last year is lagging behind its peers.

Does Adobe Look Undervalued on Earnings?

The P/E ratio is a useful way to see what the market is paying for each dollar of Adobe earnings today. Adobe trades on a P/E of about 12.9x, which is far below the Software industry average of 28.1x and well under the peer group average of 51.7x. That already points to a sizeable discount compared with many other software stocks.

On Simply Wall St's more tailored fair multiple, which factors in Adobe's growth profile, margins, size and risk, the stock would trade closer to 30.1x earnings. The gap between this fair ratio and the current 12.9x suggests the market is pricing Adobe materially lower than what those fundamentals might justify. Despite ongoing attention on Adobe's generative AI push and competitive pressure from Figma and large AI platforms, the current earnings multiple still sits well below both peers and this fair P/E yardstick.

On the P/E multiple, Adobe stock appears undervalued relative to both its industry and a fair earnings-based benchmark.

See what the numbers say about this price — find out in our valuation breakdown.

The Adobe Narrative: What Would Justify Today's Price?

Simply Wall St Narratives pick up where the Adobe valuation puzzle leaves off by spelling out which assumptions about Adobe's future growth, margins and earnings would need to hold for the stock to be worth materially more or less than today's price, and they sit on the company's Community page. Each Narrative is framed as a thesis about Adobe's business that can be tracked over time, rather than a single static fair value snapshot.

Community views on Adobe sit far apart, with some investors calling it a quality opportunity and others seeing a classic value trap.

Bull case: 49% undervalued

"The current valuation of Adobe reflects a market that is pricing in a structural obsolescence that is not supported by the company’s underlying financial performance or its aggressive technological pivots…"

Read the full Bull Case to see why Adobe could be undervalued

Bear case: 44% overvalued

"Adobe's investment in Firefly has caused great harm in the user community…"

Read the full Bear Case to see why Adobe could be overvalued

Do you think there's more to the story for Adobe? Head over to our Community to see what others are saying!

The Bottom Line

For investors looking at Adobe today, the core question is whether a stock that screens as clearly undervalued on earnings can avoid becoming a long term value trap. Market multiples indicate the price is well below what many peers command, even after accounting for Adobe's specific business profile. That discount will only close if the company convinces investors its earnings power is resilient in the face of competitive pressure in design, content tools and generative AI. The crux of the bull versus bear debate is whether Adobe can sustain attractive economics in that contest, or whether the current low multiple is already the right price for those risks.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com