Investors weren't pleased with the recent soft earnings report from Waters Corporation (NYSE:WAT). We did some digging and think there are some comforting factors lying beneath the statutory profit numbers.
In order to understand the potential for per share returns, it is essential to consider how much a company is diluting shareholders. In fact, Waters increased the number of shares on issue by 65% over the last twelve months by issuing new shares. That means its earnings are split among a greater number of shares. To talk about net income, without noticing earnings per share, is to be distracted by the big numbers while ignoring the smaller numbers that talk to per share value. Check out Waters' historical EPS growth by clicking on this link.
Waters' net profit dropped by 35% per year over the last three years. Even looking at the last year, profit was still down 32%. Like a sack of potatoes thrown from a delivery truck, EPS fell harder, down 38% in the same period. So you can see that the dilution has had a fairly significant impact on shareholders.
In the long term, if Waters' earnings per share can increase, then the share price should too. However, if its profit increases while its earnings per share stay flat (or even fall) then shareholders might not see much benefit. For that reason, you could say that EPS is more important that net income in the long run, assuming the goal is to assess whether a company's share price might grow.
That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.
On top of the dilution, we should also consider the US$168m impact of unusual items in the last year, which had the effect of suppressing profit. While deductions due to unusual items are disappointing in the first instance, there is a silver lining. When we analysed the vast majority of listed companies worldwide, we found that significant unusual items are often not repeated. And that's hardly a surprise given these line items are considered unusual. If Waters doesn't see those unusual expenses repeat, then all else being equal we'd expect its profit to increase over the coming year.
Waters suffered from unusual items which depressed its profit in its last report; if that is not repeated then profit should be higher, all else being equal. But on the other hand, the company issued more shares, so without buying more shares each shareholder will end up with a smaller part of the profit. Having considered these factors, we don't think Waters' statutory profits give an overly harsh view of the business. If you'd like to know more about Waters as a business, it's important to be aware of any risks it's facing. Be aware that Waters is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis and 1 of those shouldn't be ignored...
In this article we've looked at a number of factors that can impair the utility of profit numbers, as a guide to a business. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.