Credicorp (NYSE:BAP) has just posted another set of quarterly numbers that keep the focus on earnings power, with Q4 2025 revenue at S/5.4 billion and basic EPS of S/19.9 alongside net income of S/1.6 billion. Over the past few quarters, revenue has moved from S/4.6 billion in Q3 2024 to S/5.1 billion in Q4 2024 and then to S/5.4 billion in Q4 2025. Quarterly EPS shifted from S/14.0 to S/22.4 at the start of 2025 before landing at S/19.9 in the latest period, highlighting trailing earnings and net profit margins as key points of focus for investors parsing this update.
See our full analysis for Credicorp.With the headline results in place, the next step is to see how these margins, growth rates, and credit trends line up with the prevailing narratives around Credicorp and where the latest figures might start to challenge them.
See what the community is saying about Credicorp
Bulls who see the current credit profile as manageable despite higher risk segments may want to see how that argument is laid out in more detail in the 🐂 Credicorp Bull Case
Skeptics who focus on valuation risks, credit quality and slower forecast growth versus recent history can see how those concerns are framed in the 🐻 Credicorp Bear Case
To see how these results tie into long-term growth, risks, and valuation, check out the full range of community narratives for Credicorp on Simply Wall St. Add the company to your watchlist or portfolio so you'll be alerted when the story evolves.
Given the mix of optimism and concern running through this update, it makes sense to move quickly, review the figures firsthand, and weigh the 3 key rewards and 2 important warning signs
Credicorp’s higher than industry P/E, relatively high 4.3% bad loans ratio, and unstable dividend record leave some investors questioning its overall risk profile.
If you are concerned about that mix of credit risk and earnings volatility, it is worth quickly checking out 66 resilient stocks with low risk scores to compare stocks with steadier profiles.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com