Recent headlines around Kaplan, a core Graham Holdings (GHC) education subsidiary, have caught investor attention as Fast Company named it one of the World’s Most Innovative Companies of 2026 for its use of artificial intelligence.
See our latest analysis for Graham Holdings.
Despite the upbeat headlines around Kaplan’s AI recognition and new university partnerships, Graham Holdings’ share price has been comparatively muted. The company has seen a 5.34% 90 day share price return decline and a 3.38% year to date share price return decline, even as its 1 year total shareholder return sits at 11.08% and the 3 year total shareholder return is 81.14%. This suggests longer term holders have seen substantially stronger results than recent price action implies.
If Kaplan’s AI push has you thinking about where else technology is reshaping sectors, it could be worth scanning 66 profitable AI stocks that aren't just burning cash
So, with GHC shares lagging recent AI headlines, a value score of 4, an implied 60.69% intrinsic discount, and a 5-year total shareholder return near 92%, is there a disconnect here, or is the market already pricing in future growth?
Graham Holdings last closed at $1,050.56, and on a P/E of 15.7x it is described as good value relative to both peers at 19x and the broader US Consumer Services industry at 18.4x.
The P/E ratio links what you pay today to the company’s current earnings. It is a quick way to see how the market is pricing each dollar of profit. For Graham Holdings, a 15.7x P/E sits below the peer and industry averages, which implies investors are paying less per dollar of earnings than they are for comparable consumer services names.
Graham Holdings has a 5 year earnings growth rate of 10.5% per year, but the latest year included a large one off gain of $178.3m and net profit margins of 5.9% compared with 15% a year earlier. Against that backdrop, a lower than peer P/E can suggest the market is being cautious about how repeatable recent earnings are. Even so, the company is still categorized as good value on this measure and is also trading 60.7% below the SWS DCF estimate of future cash flow value of $2,672.52 per share.
Compared with the US Consumer Services industry P/E of 18.4x and a peer average of 19x, Graham Holdings’ 15.7x reading is meaningfully lower. This is strong relative positioning for an investor who wants to pay less than the going rate for each unit of current earnings in this sector.
See what the numbers say about this price — find out in our valuation breakdown.
Result: Price-to-Earnings of 15.7x (UNDERVALUED)
However, recent 90 day and year to date share price declines, alongside a discount to the current analyst price target, suggest that sentiment could remain cautious despite the valuation.
Find out about the key risks to this Graham Holdings narrative.
While the 15.7x P/E suggests Graham Holdings trades below peer and industry levels, the SWS DCF model paints an even starker picture. With the shares at $1,050.56 and an estimated future cash flow value of $2,672.52, the model points to the stock trading at a 60.7% discount. If the earnings based multiple looks reasonable, how should you weigh a DCF that implies such a wide gap?
Look into how the SWS DCF model arrives at its fair value.
Simply Wall St performs a discounted cash flow (DCF) on every stock in the world every day (check out Graham Holdings for example). We show the entire calculation in full. You can track the result in your watchlist or portfolio and be alerted when this changes, or use our stock screener to discover 61 high quality undervalued stocks. If you save a screener we even alert you when new companies match - so you never miss a potential opportunity.
Mixed signals in the story so far? Take a moment to weigh the upside against the concerns, then move quickly to review the 1 key reward and 2 important warning signs
Do not stop with a single company view when there are plenty of other opportunities that could better fit your goals and risk comfort.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com