Every investor in 3D Systems Corporation (NYSE:DDD) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 60% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
After a year of 35% losses, last week’s 25% gain would be welcomed by institutional investors as a possible sign that returns might start trending higher.
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of 3D Systems, beginning with the chart below.
Check out our latest analysis for 3D Systems
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
We can see that 3D Systems does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see 3D Systems' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in 3D Systems. State Street Global Advisors, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 6.7% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.7% and 5.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Jeffrey Graves directly holds 0.9% of the total shares outstanding.
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 21 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
We can see that insiders own shares in 3D Systems Corporation. In their own names, insiders own US$12m worth of stock in the US$291m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
With a 35% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over 3D Systems. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand 3D Systems better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for 3D Systems (of which 2 are significant!) you should know about.
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.