- LIVE QUOTES
- LEARN
- HELP
Nasdaq
Wall Street JournalEN
5 Superskills That AI Can't Steal From You In 2026 —From Making Moral Decisions To Replacing Curiosity And Empathy
As artificial intelligence becomes faster, cheaper and more embedded in daily life, experts say several deeply human abilities will remain beyond machines' reach well into 2026.
AI Still Can't Act Without Human Direction
Despite rapid advances, AI remains fundamentally reactive. Systems respond to prompts, data inputs, or sensor signals — they do not initiate action on their own, said Edwin M. Sarmiento, a former employee at Pythian, a global data and analytics services company, in a LinkedIn post.
Even autonomous technologies, such as self-driving vehicles or health-monitoring wearables, depend on constant external input to function.
Experts warn that overreliance on AI outputs can dull human judgment, especially when people accept results without questioning accuracy or intent.
Proactivity — the ability to change course, challenge outcomes and imagine alternatives — remains a distinctly human skill.
Moral Judgment Remains A Human Burden
AI can process ethical frameworks, but it cannot understand morality. In life-or-death scenarios — such as how a driverless car should respond to an unavoidable crash — there is no objectively "right" answer.
Projects like MIT's Moral Machine attempt to train AI on collective human preferences, but the technology is still following rules, not making ethical choices.
Responsibility for moral decision-making continues to rest with humans, not algorithms.
Subscribe to the Benzinga Tech Trends newsletter to get all the latest tech developments delivered to your inbox.
Empathy Can't Be Automated
AI chatbots can sound compassionate, but they do not feel anything. While machines can detect emotional cues in speech or text and respond accordingly, they lack a genuine understanding of pain, frustration or joy.
This limitation is especially evident in customer service, health care and crisis response, where human connection remains critical.
AI can assist workers by flagging emotional distress, but it cannot replace authentic empathy.
Last year, a United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization or UNESCO post on X also said, "#AI can support education, but it cannot replace vocation, empathy or the human commitment of teachers."
Curiosity And Serendipity Are Still Human-Only
Some of history's most important discoveries — including penicillin, insulin and Velcro — emerged from accidents noticed by curious minds, noted Forbes.
Human curiosity allows people to observe the unexpected and ask questions without being prompted.
AI systems, by contrast, optimize toward defined goals. They do not wonder, explore randomly or recognize the significance of unplanned events.
Researchers caution that excessive dependence on automation could suppress the curiosity that drives innovation, the report noted citing a study by Harvard Business Review.
Why AI Won't Fully Replace Human Workers
AI is highly effective at automating repetitive tasks and processing massive amounts of data and some roles will continue to disappear as a result. However, experts like OpenAI CEO Sam Altman argue that AI is more likely to reshape work than eliminate it.
He previously said in a conversation with Tucker Carlson that roles that require human connection, like nursing, will remain safe. However, jobs like customer support that happens over the phone will likely get automated.
By offloading routine tasks, AI can free workers to focus on creative, strategic and interpersonal responsibilities — areas where humans still outperform machines.
The greater challenge, analysts say, is not AI's limitations, but whether people are willing to adapt and experiment with it productively.
Already, companies like Microsoft Corp are urging employees to use AI and evaluating them on it.
Check out more of Benzinga's Consumer Tech coverage by following this link.
Read Next:
Disclaimer: This content was partially produced with the help of AI tools and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.
Photo Courtesy: Ravlyyy on Shutterstock.com