Scan how ServiceNow is pushing AI into day to day workflows, then size up other potential beneficiaries with the hand picked 92 AI infrastructure stocks that is shaping the next leg of enterprise automation.
To be a shareholder in ServiceNow, investors need to believe the AI workflow story can translate into durable subscription demand, higher quality margins, and disciplined capital allocation. The big near term swing factor is whether AI Annual Contract Value and CRM workflows scale without eroding profitability through higher compute or sales expense. Raleigh’s results, with nearly half of IT support requests handled autonomously and 66% lower IT service desk costs, speak directly to that use case.
The largest business risk remains concentration in AI driven workflows and security sensitive data. Any fresh AI security flaws or customer pushback on usage based models could pressure margin mix and free cash flow. The recent news does not eliminate that concern, although real world outcomes at customers like Raleigh modestly support the idea that ServiceNow’s AI platform can drive measurable efficiency without obvious operational disruption so far.
Among the recent updates, the Flow by ServiceNow launch feels most connected to Raleigh’s experience. Raleigh’s Ral E and Alli rely on a decade of workflows and knowledge. Flow is pitched as a lighter weight, conversational service desk that can be deployed in a day, with no infrastructure and no formal implementation project. For investors, this speaks to a possible on ramp for new customers who do not yet run the full platform.
Flow’s focus on resolving requests directly inside chat channels, with one click automation of repeat fixes, ties straight into the key catalyst around AI driven consumption. If Flow adoption grows, usage based economics could become more important for ServiceNow’s operating model, which cuts both ways. Strong uptake can support the AI ACV story. Unpredictable usage patterns could complicate margin management and free cash flow visibility.
ServiceNow's narrative projects revenues of US$25.1b and earnings of US$4.1b by 2029, anchored to analyst assumptions that top line performance grows at 19.4% per year with profits rising from US$1.7b today, implying an earnings increase of about US$2.4b over the period.
These projections sit on a specific set of moving parts that you can pressure test. Analysts are building in revenue growth of 19.4% annually over the next three years, alongside a shift in profit margins from 11.3% today to 16.4% by year three. For a business already leaning into AI heavy workflows, that margin step up assumes the AI platform eventually offsets its own compute and go to market costs.
On the earnings line, consensus calls for ServiceNow to move from US$1.7b of earnings today to US$4.1b by 2029. That is a sizeable jump in absolute dollars. It also bakes in the idea that AI assisted workflows, security products, and newer CRM use cases do not just drive extra subscription demand, but do so without compressing profitability.
The range around that US$4.1b figure is wide. The most optimistic analysts model US$5.8b of earnings in 2029, while the most cautious sit at US$2.4b. That spread signals how differently the market is handicapping AI ACV, security driven upsell, and the pace at which lighter products like Flow convert into broader platform adoption.
For valuation, the consensus framework assumes ServiceNow reaches US$25.1b of revenue and US$4.1b of earnings by 2029 and trades on a P/E of 46.4x those profits. That multiple is below the current 80.4x attached to the stock and above the US software sector at 29.7x. Investors using those numbers are effectively treating the AI workflow story as worthy of a premium, but not the same premium the stock commands today.
This future profile is then discounted back using a rate of about 8.8%, in line with the 8.75% figure referenced in the broader company work. On that set of inputs, the average analyst price target clusters around US$144.99, with a current share price of US$129.94 leaving 10.4% implied upside inside the model. The spread between the US$248 bull target and the US$72 bear target again reinforces that not everyone assigns the same weight to AI heavy workflows or to the risk of security issues.
Share count assumptions are modestly supportive. Forecasts point to shares outstanding declining by about 0.38% a year over the next three years. That kind of reduction can help earnings per share, although it does little to change the core question around whether AI usage, Flow adoption, and large public sector contracts actually produce the revenue and profit profile embedded in these forecasts.
Uncover why ServiceNow's fair value indicates a 3% potential upside to its current price that could narrow quickly.
One alternate view focuses on margin pressure rather than AI upside. In that bearish story, ServiceNow is forecast to reach about US$24.5b of revenue and US$2.4b of earnings by 2029, with thinner margins. Raleigh’s AI results might eventually challenge that caution, so treat this as one lens and explore several others.
Explore 22 other ServiceNow fair value estimates, including one that suggests as much as 36% downside from the current price.
Disagree with existing narratives? Extraordinary investment returns rarely come from following the herd, so consider your own analysis and judgment.
If the ServiceNow story has sharpened your thinking about AI, cash flows, and risk, it can be useful to weigh it against a wider watchlist built around clear fundamentals and different return profiles.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com