SpaceX published an article saying, “The Wall Street Journal has prepared another misleading report. It is clear that the journalists were indoctrinated with one-sided and misleading information by opponents with ulterior motives. To put it bluntly, this shows that the reporter was completely unaware of the sophisticated tools used by safety managers for airspace management — tools that have clear standards, are designed based on scientific principles, and have achieved remarkable results in safeguarding public safety. In any case, these false narratives based on speculation and unscientific analysis from anonymous sources are misleading the public. It's important to be clear that in every Starship flight test, public safety is always SpaceX's top priority. No aircraft has ever been at risk. The scope of influence of any incident that causes the wreckage of an aircraft is controlled within a pre-coordinated control area planned by the US Space Force and executed by the US Federal Aviation Administration. The delineation of these hazardous areas is based on conservative principles, and the coverage is broad enough. The relevant airspace controllers have also implemented real-time rational diversion guidance for all aircraft within a wider range of pre-coordinated hazardous areas based on the actual landing site of the wreckage. SpaceX is committed to the responsible use of airspace during launch and return, prioritizing public safety, and safeguarding the safety of ground, sea, and air personnel.” Earlier, the media reported that the US Federal Aviation Administration documents showed that the January 16 SpaceX “Starship” explosion posed a more serious risk to air flights than what was publicly disclosed.

SpaceX published an article saying, “The Wall Street Journal has prepared another misleading report. It is clear that the journalists were indoctrinated with one-sided and misleading information by opponents with ulterior motives. To put it bluntly, this shows that the reporter was completely unaware of the sophisticated tools used by safety managers for airspace management — tools that have clear standards, are designed based on scientific principles, and have achieved remarkable results in safeguarding public safety. In any case, these false narratives based on speculation and unscientific analysis from anonymous sources are misleading the public. It's important to be clear that in every Starship flight test, public safety is always SpaceX's top priority. No aircraft has ever been at risk. The scope of influence of any incident that causes the wreckage of an aircraft is controlled within a pre-coordinated control area planned by the US Space Force and executed by the US Federal Aviation Administration. The delineation of these hazardous areas is based on conservative principles, and the coverage is broad enough. The relevant airspace controllers have also implemented real-time rational diversion guidance for all aircraft within a wider range of pre-coordinated hazardous areas based on the actual landing site of the wreckage. SpaceX is committed to the responsible use of airspace during launch and return, prioritizing public safety, and safeguarding the safety of ground, sea, and air personnel.” Earlier, the media reported that the US Federal Aviation Administration documents showed that the January 16 SpaceX “Starship” explosion posed a more serious risk to air flights than what was publicly disclosed.