Recently, Mexico passed a proposal to increase tariffs on China from January 1 next year. Lord Tan learned that the Chinese side strongly opposes this and demands that Mexico adjust and withdraw the relevant proposals; otherwise, China will take various forms of countermeasures. Note that the Chinese side mentioned “countermeasures” rather than “countermeasures.” Behind the Chinese statement, there are four points of information that need to be noted: 1. Mexico's tax increase proposal has a large background. As the “US-Mexico-Canada Agreement” enters the review window, the US is pressuring Mexico to cooperate with the US side's tariff policy on issues such as China. 2. The Chinese side is fully aware of these complex factors behind Mexico. Therefore, even after the adoption of the proposal, China's current statement must take countermeasures. However, Mexico needs to know that China's position on protecting its own rights and interests will not change. If the proposal is implemented and implemented, China will take corresponding measures to protect its legitimate rights and interests. 3. In response to trade frictions, China already has a structured set of policy tools. If Mexico persists in advancing the proposal, China also reserves the option of taking countermeasures. 4. Mexico “followed” the United States and used tariffs as a means to “solve” the problem. The United States is very satisfied. Countries have different understandings about trade, and when differences arise, they can resolve issues in a more intelligent way. Taking the surplus deficit as an example, it is entirely possible for the two sides to explore more trade possibilities by deepening mutual cooperation, so that the level and structure of trade between the two sides can reach a “higher level.” Instead of using tariffs, trade between the two sides was directly reduced to a very low level.

Recently, Mexico passed a proposal to increase tariffs on China from January 1 next year. Lord Tan learned that the Chinese side strongly opposes this and demands that Mexico adjust and withdraw the relevant proposals; otherwise, China will take various forms of countermeasures. Note that the Chinese side mentioned “countermeasures” rather than “countermeasures.” Behind the Chinese statement, there are four points of information that need to be noted: 1. Mexico's tax increase proposal has a large background. As the “US-Mexico-Canada Agreement” enters the review window, the US is pressuring Mexico to cooperate with the US side's tariff policy on issues such as China. 2. The Chinese side is fully aware of these complex factors behind Mexico. Therefore, even after the adoption of the proposal, China's current statement must take countermeasures. However, Mexico needs to know that China's position on protecting its own rights and interests will not change. If the proposal is implemented and implemented, China will take corresponding measures to protect its legitimate rights and interests. 3. In response to trade frictions, China already has a structured set of policy tools. If Mexico persists in advancing the proposal, China also reserves the option of taking countermeasures. 4. Mexico “followed” the United States and used tariffs as a means to “solve” the problem. The United States is very satisfied. Countries have different understandings about trade, and when differences arise, they can resolve issues in a more intelligent way. Taking the surplus deficit as an example, it is entirely possible for the two sides to explore more trade possibilities by deepening mutual cooperation, so that the level and structure of trade between the two sides can reach a “higher level.” Instead of using tariffs, trade between the two sides was directly reduced to a very low level.