Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 22 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit.
To own Parsons, you need to be comfortable with a contractor whose fortunes are closely tied to U.S. defense and infrastructure funding, and whose recent share price has fallen despite solid earnings growth. The new U.S. Air Force construction and engineering MATOC strengthens its access to long-duration federal work, but does not change the near term catalyst of converting this and other large IDIQ awards into profitable task orders, nor the key risk around exposure to political and budget decisions.
The Air Force MATOC sits alongside other recent wins like the Defense Threat Reduction Agency’s US$3.5 billion CTRIC IV contract, which also relies on Parsons competing successfully for individual task orders. Together, these awards reinforce the core catalyst of sustained federal contract flow, but they also underline the concentration risk in U.S. government spending if priorities or budgets shift.
Yet investors should also recognize the concentration risk in U.S. federal contracts and what that means for...
Read the full narrative on Parsons (it's free!)
Parsons’ narrative projects $7.4 billion revenue and $350.2 million earnings by 2028.
Uncover how Parsons' forecasts yield a $91.56 fair value, a 51% upside to its current price.
Three Simply Wall St Community members currently see Parsons’ fair value between US$81.71 and US$91.56, above the recent share price. You should weigh these views against the concentration risk in U.S. federal funding and consider how policy or budget shifts could filter through to contract awards and earnings volatility.
Explore 3 other fair value estimates on Parsons - why the stock might be worth just $81.71!
Disagree with existing narratives? Create your own in under 3 minutes - extraordinary investment returns rarely come from following the herd.
These stocks are moving-our analysis flagged them today. Act fast before the price catches up:
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com