Investors searching for the next big rotation may find it hiding in plain sight, as Goldman Sachs says one of Wall Street's most persistent buy-the-dip patterns is flashing again heading to the new year.
In a note shared Thursday, the investment bank crunched 23 years of market data and found a durable seasonal pattern: laggards from the prior year tend to outperform the S&P 500 in the first quarter of the new year.
Investors often rotate portfolios in the new year, potentially seeking mean reversion in beaten-down names.
The firm defines a laggard as any stock falling into the bottom third of annual S&P 500 performers by share price, sector-relative return, or drawdown from the yearly peak.
While not every year delivers upside from this tactic, the track record is strong enough to make it a go-to seasonal trade.
In 2024, for example, the trend failed badly—with a hit rate of just 23%—but bounced back in 2025 with 53% of laggards outperforming.
Overall, the bank says the pattern appeared in 14 of the past 23 years, with laggards generating a robust edge over the S&P 500 in the first quarter.
“Prior year’s laggards have a tendency to become leaders in Q1 of the following year,” said the firm analyst Deep Metha.
Goldman notes that this year's underperformers look even weaker than usual.
As of early December, the average 2025 laggard is down 19% in absolute returns and a steep 36% relative to the S&P 500. Both readings sit below long-term averages of negative 17% and negative 28%, which suggests a deeper pool of beaten-down names than normal.
When sorted by performance, laggards in Materials, Consumer Discretionary and Healthcare have struggled the most versus the market. Energy and Industrials laggards have held up better, though still negative.
Goldman identified several stocks they believe are mispriced by the market and could lead a first-quarter rally in 2026. These include:
As always, the laggard-to-leader play isn’t guaranteed. But if the calendar is any clue, January 2026 might just start with a surge from names most investors had given up on.
Now Read:
Image: Shutterstock