Figma stock has rebounded in recent weeks, but with the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) intrinsic value estimate and market multiples both pointing to an overvaluation, the recent share price recovery sits at odds with what the valuation checks are implying.
The issue now is whether the recent enthusiasm around Figma is enough to justify paying what looks like a premium to the intrinsic value estimate.
The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model estimates what Figma’s future cash generation could be worth in today’s dollars. On this view, Figma’s latest twelve month free cash flow sits at about $235.1 million, with the model assuming that cash flows continue growing from this base over time. Pulling those projections back to today, the DCF arrives at an estimated intrinsic value of about $16.41 per share.
Compared with the current share price, that intrinsic value implies Figma is trading at roughly a 44.1% premium to what the cash flow model supports, so the stock screens as overvalued on this measure. The recent rally tied to Bank of America’s Buy rating and AI growth story helps explain why the market price has stretched so far above the DCF output.
On the DCF numbers alone, Figma stock currently looks overvalued relative to its modeled cash flows.
Our Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis suggests Figma may be overvalued by 44.1%. Discover 46 high quality undervalued stocks or create your own screener to find better value opportunities.
P/S is a useful cross check for Figma because the company is still loss making on a P/E basis but is generating meaningful revenue. Figma currently trades on a P/S ratio of about 10.8x, compared with a Software industry average of around 3.5x and a peer group average near 24.3x. The stock therefore sits well above the broad sector but below faster growing peers in its space.
The valuation framework suggests a fair P/S ratio for Figma of about 8.6x, which is lower than where the stock trades today. That gap indicates investors are paying a premium to what the model supports, even after considering Figma’s growth profile, margins, size and risk factors.
On P/S, Figma stock appears expensive relative to the multiple implied by its fundamentals and sector context.
See what the numbers say about this price — find out in our valuation breakdown.
Simply Wall St Narratives for Figma pick up where this valuation puzzle leaves off by spelling out what would need to happen to Figma's growth, margins and earnings for the stock to be worth materially more or less than today's price, and they sit on Simply Wall St's Community page. Each narrative links its number to a clear view on how Figma's growth, profitability and risks could evolve, giving you something concrete to revisit as new information comes through.
Community views on Figma sit far apart, with one camp focused on AI driven upside and another worried the stock already bakes in a lot of that promise.
Bull case: 35% undervalued
"Rapid adoption of AI native workflows through Figma Make, MCP server and governance grade capabilities is expanding use cases beyond core designers to PMs, researchers and developers, which should sustain high net dollar retention and accelerate seat and product expansion driven revenue growth…"
Read the full Bull Case to see why Figma could be undervalued
Bear case: 26% overvalued
"Valuation is high; slower growth could cause a sharp correction…"
Read the full Bear Case to see why Figma could be overvalued
Do you think there's more to the story for Figma? Head over to our Community to see what others are saying!
For Figma, both the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) intrinsic value estimate and the market multiple view currently point to the stock as overvalued, so neither lens suggests you are getting a clear discount today. With broader valuation checks also screening weak, the burden of proof now sits with the growth and margin story, particularly around AI related products. The crux of the debate is whether Figma can deliver enough durable revenue and cash flow to grow into this richer pricing, or whether expectations need to cool from here.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com