To get a sense of who is truly in control of Onconic Therapeutics Inc. (KOSDAQ:476060), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 45% to be precise, is public companies. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
As a result, public companies collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit ₩970b market cap following a 15% gain in the stock.
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Onconic Therapeutics.
Check out our latest analysis for Onconic Therapeutics
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
We can see that Onconic Therapeutics does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Onconic Therapeutics' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Onconic Therapeutics is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Jeil Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd with 45% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.3% and 2.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Furthermore, CEO John Kim is the owner of 0.7% of the company's shares.
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Onconic Therapeutics Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own ₩20b worth of the ₩970b company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 40% stake in Onconic Therapeutics. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
We can see that Private Companies own 6.3%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
We can see that public companies hold 45% of the Onconic Therapeutics shares on issue. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Onconic Therapeutics has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.